Hospice use among Medicare managed care and fee-for-service patients dying with cancer.

نویسندگان

  • Ellen P McCarthy
  • Risa B Burns
  • Quyen Ngo-Metzger
  • Roger B Davis
  • Russell S Phillips
چکیده

CONTEXT For most patients aged 65 years or older with cancer, hospice services are uniformly covered by Medicare. Hospice care is believed to improve care for patients at the end of life. However, few patients use hospice and others enroll too late to maximize the benefits of hospice services. OBJECTIVES Because type of insurance may affect use, we examined whether patients with Medicare managed care insurance enrolled in hospice earlier and had longer hospice stays than patients with Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) insurance. DESIGN AND SETTING Retrospective analysis of the last year of life using the Linked Medicare-Tumor Registry Database in 1 of 9 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program coverage areas. PATIENTS A total of 260 090 Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 years or older diagnosed with first primary lung (n = 62 117), colorectal (n = 57 260), prostate (n = 59 826), female breast (n = 37 609), bladder (n = 19 598), pancreatic (n = 11 378), gastric (n = 9599), or liver (n = 2703) cancer between January 1, 1973, and December 31, 1996, and who died between January 1, 1988, and December 31, 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Time from diagnosis to hospice entry and hospice length of stay for patients enrolled in FFS vs managed care plans after adjusting for patient demographics, tumor registry, year of hospice entry, and type and cancer stage. RESULTS Of the 260 090 patients, most were men (59%), white (85%), and enrolled in FFS (89.7%). Only 54 937 patients (21.1%) received hospice care before death. Hospice use varied by type of primary cancer ranging from 31.8% of patients with pancreatic cancer to 15.6% with bladder cancer. Managed care patients were more likely to use hospice than FFS patients (32.4% vs 19.8%, P<.001). Among hospice patients, median (interquartile range) length of stay was longer for managed care vs FFS patients (32 days [11-82] vs 25 days [9-66], P<.001). After adjustment, managed care patients had higher rates of hospice enrollment (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.35-1.42) and had a longer length of stay (adjusted HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88-0.94) vs FFS patients. Managed care patients were less likely to enroll in hospice within 7 days of their death (18.6% vs 22.6%, P<.001) and somewhat more likely to enroll in hospice more than 180 days before death (7.8% vs 6.1%, P<.001); the results for each of the 8 cancer diagnoses were similar. Hospice enrollment and length of stay among managed care vs FFS patients differed significantly by region. CONCLUSION Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in managed care had consistently higher rates of hospice use and significantly longer hospice stays than those enrolled in FFS. Although these differences may reflect patient and family preferences, our findings raise the possibility that some managed care plans are more successful at facilitating or encouraging hospice use for patients dying with cancer.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Including Hospice in Medicare Capitation Payments: Would it Save Money?

Hospice services received by Medicare risk-based health maintenance organization (HMO) enrollees are paid on a non-capitated basis, creating financial incentives for HMOs to encourage their terminally ill patients to elect hospice. Using Medicare administrative records for 1998, we found that hospice enrollment in the last month of life was significantly higher among HMO enrollees than among be...

متن کامل

Disenrollment from Medicare managed care among beneficiaries with and without a cancer diagnosis.

BACKGROUND Medicare managed care may offer enrollees lower out-of-pocket costs and provide benefits that are not available in the traditional fee-for-service Medicare program. However, managed care plans may also restrict provider choice in an effort to control costs. We compared rates of voluntary disenrollment from Medicare managed care to traditional fee-for-service Medicare among Medicare m...

متن کامل

Impact of continued biased disenrollment from the Medicare Advantage Program to fee-for-service.

BACKGROUND Medicare managed care enrollees who disenroll to fee-for-service (FFS) historically have worse health and higher costs than continuing enrollees and beneficiaries remaining in FFS. OBJECTIVE To examine disenrollment patterns by analyzing Medicare payments following disenrollment from Medicare Advantage (MA) to FFS in 2007. Recent growth in the MA program, introduction of limits on ...

متن کامل

Association between the Medicare hospice benefit and health care utilization and costs for patients with poor-prognosis cancer.

IMPORTANCE More patients with cancer use hospice currently than ever before, but there are indications that care intensity outside of hospice is increasing, and length of hospice stay decreasing. Uncertainties regarding how hospice affects health care utilization and costs have hampered efforts to promote it. OBJECTIVE To compare utilization and costs of health care for patients with poor-pro...

متن کامل

Managed care and inpatient mortality in adults: effect of primary payer

BACKGROUND Because managed care is increasingly prevalent in health care finance and delivery, it is important to ascertain its effects on health care quality relative to that of fee-for-service plans. Some stakeholders are concerned that basing gatekeeping, provider selection, and utilization management on cost may lower quality of care. To date, research on this topic has been inconclusive, l...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • JAMA

دوره 289 17  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003